![]() ![]() I find the Wren 96 to outperform the WD 96 in firmer conditions as well. Meaning they will likely more similarly to the WD than the MFrees. I prefer Wrens but may not provide the variation the MFrees would (never skied them myself). Not sure they will fully tickle your itch but different enough from the Woodsman to continue on with the experiment. I find them to be more directional and quicker to accelerate than the Woodsman 108. They are on par (perhaps better) than the WD108 on groomers and firm off-piste and WAY better in deep snow.ĭefinitely give the Wrens 108s a try. The playful charger that skis like a narrow Billy Goat, but with better all-Mtn manners. Based on my experience with 189 Wrens, those weren’t the answer either. Not loose enough in 4-6” and kind of dead. Good ski but not great at anything in particular. That said, I just picked up a pair of Wrenegade 108s, I'm expecting the same dampness but more pop? Am I barking up the wrong tree?įor context I have a pair of OG Billy Goats and the rest of my quiver is Moment, Commander 98, DW, WC, WC108.īG lover here who had similar thoughts on the Woodsman 108 187 here in the PNW. They're the grizzly corns which I hate to get rid of. ![]() ![]() I haven't really had a chance to take them out in their ideal conditions, 4-6" of fresh, but I'm continuing on my hunt for the perfect 108. They are "fine", easy to pivot and damp, but the tail seems dead coming out of the turn. I bought a pair of Woodsman 108s 187cm last year and honestly I just haven't gotten along with them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |